Part one:
Inspiring…
When
you think about a classroom problem, do you try to see it from different “angles”
(p.4)?
Yes, I feel that I do try to solve problems by looking at them from different angles.
I am very reflective in how I sink into contemplation when issues are occurring
in the classroom. I cringe at the thought of teachers attempting to use
textbooks as the one and only source for handling classroom management,
curriculum construction, learning outcomes, etc. I remember when the Harry Wong
books were my “go to” for just about everything and how disappointed I was when
many of his suggested techniques backfired on me. If an educator stays in technician mode how
will they ever resolve educational problems? There is no “one size fits all” when
handling the everyday occurrences that present themselves in the classroom. There
is also very little time to think about the way we will react in an “on the
spot” situation. That being said, there is time to think about how you reacted
later on and assess whether or not the issue was handled properly or
efficiently.
Pushed my buttons (In regards to the discouraging
reflectivity part)…
In
what ways might the structure of classrooms and schools contribute to and/or
discourage teacher reflectivity (p.13)?
I think most schools are structured in a way that supports teacher
reflectivity. Most will provide mentoring during the first years of teaching
which allows the educator to get feedback from professionals based on their
reflective inquiries. Administrators periodically evaluate teachers and encourage
self evaluation afterwards that urges teachers to be more in tune with their
teaching practices. Also, professional development and training is oftentimes
provided or encouraged by school leaders. Workshops, seminars, and conferences
can aid teachers as they become more consciously
and systematically reflective in
the educational field.
On the other hand, I think teacher reflectivity is sometimes discouraged because
it involves transformation. Not all schools are open to change. Some schools
are traditionally set in their ways. And other times factors such as low
funding or politics halt reflective action. Reflective teachers may find themselves in a situation
where they want or need their voice to be heard and yet no one is willing to collaborate.
Challenging…
If
a student comes to you angry with another student or crying and upset, what is
your first reaction? What other reactions might you have? Do you ever react
differently to students (or to their parents) depending on their gender, race,
or social class background (p.16)?
My
first reaction is to get this student in a more private setting so that other
students do not flock to the scene and create chaos. By removing the student
from a more public setting you are better able to talk one on one with that
student and better assess the situation. You are also more likely to get honest
or more truthful answers that aren’t created as a means to “fit in” with or
appease peers. Next, I would see if the situation was dependent on a guidance counselor
as I may send them directly to the guidance office. In a situation where a
fight has occurred, the result may be to have a student seek disciplinary
assistance. Administrators may want the
student to file an incident report. If
the situation is beyond a school leader’s control then I would make contact
with the SRO (school resource officer).
In
the past, I have reacted differently to students depending upon gender and
social class. Because I am female, I can oftentimes help a female student in a
more relatable way. The issues arising can involve menstrual cycles, sexual
harassment, bulling, etc. In my experience, girls have sought me out for more
assistance than male students. I do find myself having more “personal” talks
with females rather than guys as they are often more open in discussing the problems
that they are having.
I have a tendency to handle situations with the underprivileged in a specialized
way. There is a direct correlation between social economic status and academic success.
Therefore, I try to make sure there is as much equity in the classroom as
possible. However, sometimes that means
I may provide a sketchpad or other art materials to someone who can’t afford it.
Other times, it could mean that I am providing extra time/tutoring to a student
who maybe didn’t have a “good night” at home the night before.
Part Two
Openmindedness:
I
loved the way the critical believer was described as being “willing to enter sympathetically
into opposing points of view because they realize that all belief systems have
weaknesses and can be strengthened by the confrontations with different beliefs.”
Let’s face it; we are all prone to having our own distinct ideas in relation to
the classroom. Maybe we have goals/objectives that we find most important for
our students to learn. Perhaps, we have our own vision of what a
teacher-student relationship looks like. Or…it could be that we have become
firmly attached to certain pedagogical strategies. Sometimes I think we expect
our students to be open-minded and accepting of new practices, and yet we never
question our own role in this concept! What I enjoy so much about being in teacher
education programs is the fact that we get to share and investigate new ideas.
My goal is to become more of a “critical believer” as I think that
transformation in the classroom is vital to growth. We have to change with the
times and create relevant and meaningful learning experiences for the students of
today!
Responsibility:
Our
teaching can make or break a student’s journey into learning. How fragile and delicate
the mind and soul can be! We are responsible for how a student’s self-concept,
intellectual development, and social/life experiences are shaped. And yet our
viewpoints on how to develop our curriculum are in direct relation to what WE
find important to learn. As a reflective teacher, it is important to step back and
acknowledge that we sometimes have isolated perspectives. We must, as educators,
continue to examine the consequences and outcomes of our teaching.
Wholeheartedness:
The
statement that resonated with me the most in this section explained how teachers
who are wholehearted “regularly examine their own assumptions and beliefs and
the results of their actions and approach all situations with the attitude that
they can learn something new.” When I read this I kept thinking about teachers
with a resistance to change that never think twice about trying something fresh
or foreign to them. And to tie this back to the Washington Post article, I
would say it reminded me of the section that reads:
“11) Enough humility to remember it’s not about you. It’s about the kids. If
your ego rules your classroom, if the class turns into “me vs. them” or if you
can’t understand that a sixteen year old might be able to tell you something
you don’t know, then don’t teach. Or at least, don’t teach high school.”
Also,
I think that if you are wholehearted in Art, then you are inquisitive and
excited about your content area. You are enthusiastic enough to break out of
your regular routine! This involves constructing a curriculum that allows for flexibility.
There are great outcomes in designing lessons that help to create engagement
between you and your students. In the end, they learn from you, and you gain
knowledge from them.
Part Three
I’m
in my sixth year of teaching, and just took on a new job position close to
home. I am now teaching in the same high school that I attended and graduated
from in 1998. Times have changed! When I was the Visual Arts I student in this
room, the curriculum was written so that it focused more on the foundations and
history of art. The textbook was the staple that tied all of the learning
together. There were probably five art making projects during the 18 weeks of
study. The mentality was that you speak when spoken to; otherwise… you don’t speak
at all.
After I graduated, another teacher came to the school and seemed to broaden the
curriculum a bit to include more student-centered projects and art making
experiences. However, the textbook was
still used for most of the instructional time (esp. for the first year art
students). Years have passed, and here I am again! I am now the teacher and I
would say that I have taken drastic measures in re-shaping the curriculum. I like to mix pedagogical methods, and play
with both traditional and contemporary strategies. I have constructed separate curriculum
maps for Art I, II, III, and have also added two more. My two brand new designs
are used in my College Board Studio AP Art (advanced art) classes. And my very latest
one is titled: “Artcology (a combination of Art and Ecology that is used to
further learning in Eco-Art Education).
Part Four
During
week two, I completed the Marzano’s self-score and have decided to highlight
two areas that I would like to work through throughout the semester. My focus
will be on the creation of game-like strategies and the inclusion of more
physical activity.
As I discussed in week
two, I’ve been hoping to include more game-like strategies in my classroom, but
wasn’t sure how I could make it work for my classroom. I do invite my students
to engage in some activities such as “art style category” games, but feel I
could definitely tie in more ideas. I have struggled to do this because
it seems there is often a power struggle. At times I feel some students try to
answer all of the questions while many of the others hide from the spotlight.
That
being said, studies show that you can strengthen and promote learning skills
through the use of game-like activities. I feel that if executed properly, these
activities could be tied to real-world themes or topics and help keep students
more engaged and make learning more relevant.
My
students are active whenever we work with paint, printmaking, gesture drawings
and other activities where movement is necessary. However, I feel as though my
students refrain from a lot of physical activity. It is sometimes difficult to
motivate them to be more mobile when I need them to be.
I do
feel many of my students are less active due to technological advancements, and
poor diet. Movement/exercise is important in improving both body and mind. Research
does show that physical activity can help students with cognition, attention
span, and can also help improve classroom behavior as well. I also think it can
invigorate creative response. For these many reasons, I will be looking for new
ways to include more bodily-kinesthetic approaches during my lessons.